Daily Archives: February 7, 2012

Expected Samsung Galaxy S III to Debute on March 22nd in France?

“Contrary to the wishful thinking of many, Samsung confirmed it will not introduce the Galaxy S III smartphone at its March 22nd event in France. [...]“, reports intomobile.com

I personally think Samsung better works on the device some more if they aren’t confident showing what they’ve got so far. Rather a delayed release than a half-assed attempt resulting in a bug-ridden device in the name of more profits.

That said, once the device lands –and if it brings in all the rumored features –, I’m sure Samsung is going to turn a healthy profit on it.

Samsung Galaxy Tab 7.7 – One of the Two Android Tablets I’d Actually Use

The other one is Asus’ Transformer Prime with a question mark put next to its name as a reminder. If Asus manages to fix Wi-Fi issues — and I have high hopes that it does –, then it will be the 10 inch Android tablet I’d have.

Reading the Engadget review I’ve got the impression that Galaxy Tab 7.7 is as good as 7 inch tablets come. Which is why it’s the second Android tablet I’d use.

It doesn’t have a clean-cut surface where iPad could hit it, as the two cover completely different target audiences. Three inches in screen size make all the difference, so does the gap between the prices of the two devices.

The thing I really like about this device — and it’s obvious from just looking at it — is that it’s put together the way it’s supposed to. Gives off the impression that it’s well thought out and designed to be the premium model. Not just the top model of sub-10 inch Samsung tablets, but all sub-10 inch tablets anyone makes.

It looks like it’s made to be the one device you can shove into the faces of your iPad flinging friends. And one of the very few tablets they don’t mind being shoved into their faces.

I’ll give you the quick run-down of key features before I’d point you to the extensive review.

- It’s simple, clean looking and has nothing flashy about it.
- Battery life is phenomenal, exceeding that of the iPad
- 1280 x 800 AMOLED 7.7″ display. Looks great.
- 1.4 GHz Dual-Core CPU, 1GB RAM
- Weighs 0.74 lbs (335g)
- Runs Honeycomb 3.2

For the review, please pay a visit to engadget.com.

Photo belongs to digitaltrends.com. Thank you!

Toshiba Excite X10 Lands in the U.S. in Early 2012, Changes Name to AT200 and Goes to the U.K. in February

Toshiba is on the roll today. Satellite U840 arrived without much fanfare earlier, now the manufacturer announces they’re taking over the tablet market in the UK with Excite X10 renamed to AT200. Android tablet market, that is.

Hardware-wise the device looks decent, if not promising. A 1.2 GHz Texas Instrument ARM chip keeps up with the tasks at hand. Screen resolution remains 1280 x 800 stretched over 10.1″. Toshiba included 1GB of operating RAM for smooth running.

Flash storage capacity starts at 16GB and goes all the way up to twice that in all of one step.

Photographers won’t pick it up just for the back-facing camera, everyone else will do fine with the 5MP sensor. 1.3MP looks forward to when you want to video chat.

There is nothing to really hate about the hardware setup and the chassis isn’t likely to ruin the chances of the tablet either. Brushed metal all around, with a flat bottom. I like it quite a lot, regardless the fact that the whole thing is just 7.7mm thick. Thin or not, I like the way it looks.

Only if Toshiba didn’t settle with Honeycomb for the operating system. Ice Cream Sandwich has been available for months and should have been used accordingly. Toshiba expects to roll out an ICS update shortly. With the track record of certain manufacturers that actively endorse and make use of Android, I wouldn’t bet a significant amount on it coming as if it was a top priority.

Pricing roughly follows that of the iPad 2, getting your mind off of £399 for the 16GB version, helping you out by putting £449 to good use for the 32GB model.

That said, the tablet still looks fun to use with enough horsepower to get you through the day. Or Breaking Bad episode.

Whichever comes first.

Interested? Good.

via the ever so super The Verge.
Photo courtesy of tweakers.net. Thank You!

How Far does a High-Spec Ultrabook Get You? I Would Put Those Benjamins Away…

Here we are. Discussing Ultrabooks, because you figured you’d give them a shot. Nothing wrong with that, Ultrabooks are great for a wide array of things. They’re fast enough. They’re light enough. They’re portable enough and just as importantly, they usually don’t pull your bank account to a poorly lit alley.

Most models go between $800 and $1300 with a couple of exceptions. High-spec models, that’s right, you’ve guessed it.

Manufacturers don’t simply release a one-size-fits-all notebook. If they go into the trouble of designing a chassis, a motherboard and a marketing campaign, chances are they won’t stop until they’ve defined –and sold, of course– two or three tiers. Rungs on the ladder of overlapping target auidences.

The cheapest one is put in the windows to bring in the masses. They can go and say, “Hey, look at our product, it retails for $799 and change”. Once you’re on the hook, they try and sell you on the stronger processor, more spacious storage or the exclusive three-years volcano damage coverage.

Fact is, you don’t need them.

What is that?

You want the decked-out setup now that you’re paying good money?

Seldom is the high-spec model the better option…

You see, the logic you’re following is spotless. When I shell out $1,000 for a laptop, I intend to use it for a good number of years, too. That requires quality. That requires longevity.

More money means more processing power and higher-quality parts; the laptop runs out of steam later, which in turn allows you to save some dough on the long-run by not upgrading every eighteen months.

The problem is that you are getting the same quality regardless of the spec. Both the premium and the Best Buy edition come with the same hinges. Same chassis, same keyboard, same trackpad.

The difference tends to be a stronger processor, more memory and a bigger hard-disk drive. Or SSD in the case of Ultrabooks.

Let’s take the best selling Ultrabook for example. Asus sells three Zenbook UX31E setups. The bare-ass (they fondly refer to it as UX31E-DH52) version has an Intel i5-2557M CPU, 4 GB of RAM and a 128GB SSD.

The first notch above base-camp is called the UX31E-DH53 and gets you the same exact setup except for 256GBs of SSD instead of 128GB. You may justify the bigger SSD by saying your apps just don’t fit 128GB no matter how you slice it. Fair enough. Most people can, on the other hand, make 128GB work and if not, there are 1TB External HDDs for mind-bogglingly low amounts of cash. (The tiny WD Passport USB 3.0 version sells for $130 give or take).

I trust you can decide whether you absolutely must have 256GB inside your Ultrabook or can get away with half the capacity and a price tag more friendly to the tune of $300.

Now, there is the premium model Asus calls UX31E-DH72. It does have an Intel i7-2667M processor and the aforementioned bump to the bigger Solid-State Drive. Again, same 4GB ram, same trackpad, same battery, same screen and very same chassis. The price difference between the nude UX31E and the GT-Turbo-Racing UX31E is somewhere between $450 and $500 depending on whom you ask.

$500 gets you 128GB extra SSD storage and an i7 CPU instead of i5. There is no small SSD + i7 setup if you were wondering.

Is the souped-up version worth the difference?

I don’t see why it would. If you take a look at what figures the two available processor options pull in terms of benchmarks, you can conclude that the two are functionally identical. As in, you can’t tell which is which if they put the two in front of you and slap you on the wrists every time you try to open System Preferences.

I mean, they’re virtually identical in terms of raw power.

Which brings us to my point. If you can work around having the smaller SSD, even if by using an external HDD, do it and don’t pay 30-50% extra. A 50% premium in case of a laptop looks ugly. $500 ugly.

Instead of moving vertically — up the rungs of the upgrade ladder –, I say you might want to consider going horizontally. Why not? If the model you’re looking at doesn’t fit your needs, go see if another brand produces something that does.

The model you’re looking at meets your expectations, but fails on build quality? Don’t even think about going for the premium model. It’s bound to be the same thing, only with more power inside. Other manufacturers might have taken other features seriously.

You know, the trackpad for starters.

ASUS Zenbook UX31E sells for $999 at the time of writing and happens to be best-seller Ultrabook on Amazon.

Photo from HighTechDad. Thank You!

Toshiba Satellite U840 Now Official – Tech Specs

Toshiba went ahead itself and shown off the Satellite U840 at CES 2012 in January, without telling anyone what it is and what are they going to call it. It’s here. Well, not exactly here. Available in Australia and Singapore and presumably arrives to the United States in a few weeks.

To me it looks a bit chubby (3.81 lbs / 1.73 Kg) and there is no information regarding battery life to justify the weight. That said, it can very well become the go-to solution for mass-deployment in businesses. Assuming that the build-quality meets the high expectations.

Regardless, here is the tech spec sheet as the usual follow-up to the Ultrabook Knowledge Base, which I already updated with known details.

Processor
Intel i5-2467M | 1.60 GHz (2.3) | 2 Cores (HT) | 3 MB Cache | GB : 4,800
Basic model is hinted to come with i3 chips. No precise information available as to which exact model. Most probably i3-2367m (as it fits with its 17W power envelope).

Memory
8GB DDR3 1333MHz (8GB Max. due to Memory controller in CPU)

Storage
128GB SSD or 320GB HDD (5400RPM) + 16GB SSD

Battery
6-cell of unknown capacity.

Weight
from 3.81 lbs (1,730g)

Chassis
Brushed Aluminum

Ports and Connectivity
Audio jack, Microphone in, 802.11 b/g/n wireless, RJ-45 10/100 ethernet, 2x USB 2.0, 1x USB 3.0, SD memory card reader, HDMI Output, Bluetooth 3.0

Keyboard
Backlit island-style (chiclet).

Display
14.0″ 1366×768

Availability
First shown at CES 2012, available in Singapore and Australia, no word on US distribution.

Entry Point Price
est. around $1,000 . High-spec model is AUD$1,499 ~$1,600 (inc. GST)

Photo via softpedia.com. Thank you!

 Scroll to top